This tree shows several updates:
- another I-Y4460* sample, it's from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
and I think he has earlier ancestry from Slovakiahis family was "from Montenegro where they have been living for a few centuries, and before that they lived in Macedonia or Bulgaria" (edited thanks to comment below from Georg) - a new branch called I-FT78951, the samples are from Poland and Ukraine
- another sample in I-Y88617 (all three samples are from Sweden). Two of the samples belong to the more specific I-Y109860 branch
- I-FT16121 which is immediately below I-Y3118
Click here to find our previous tree for I-Y4460
Click here for a brief description of the I-Y4460 haplogroup
@Bernie, @Zdenko, I know I maybe not right, I have not full and correct understanding, but phrase "B57+ not reported in Big Y, should be checked in I-S8201" seems to me not fully relevant anymore, considering Big Y-700 does provide more details in regards to Y3106 and B57, and as result, BAM file uploaded to YFULL now gives ability to see more reads. Also FTDNA - now I can at least see Y3106 in "Named Variants". But YES, B57 is still NOT shown in "Named Variants" section of Big Y results. But on SNPs Haplogroup page B57 shown as "Presumed Positive".
ReplyDeleteMaybe it needs to rephrase or additional FTDNA research around such SNPs like B57 and Y3106. I don't know any other examples, hope you know, and can see the similarity.
PS.
Big Y-500 BAM uploaded to YFULL, shows Y3106 and B57 as “no call”.
Big Y-700 BAM uploaded to YFUL shows as “positive”:
- B57 does have 2 reads, and weight of T is 1.0.
- Y3106 does have 13 reads, but it’s less confident: C(~0.7633), G(~0.2366), error (~0.3347). So it’s shown as positive, but still questionable.
I keep updated YFULL results on my blog:
https://lundiak.wordpress.com/2018/07/30/yfull-com-results-ydna/
The man who is I-Y4460* lives in Bosnia and Herzegovina, but his family is from Montenegro where they have been living for a few centuries, and before that they lived in Macedonia or Bulgaria. The surname is not pronounced /Kohan/ but /Kot͡ʃan/.
ReplyDeleteAndrii, I will ask Zdenko about the B57+ comment. Maybe he forgot to remove from the tree
ReplyDeleteGeorg, thanks for the information about the I-Y4460* sample
Any time.
ReplyDelete